Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences - 2000; 16(2)
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org
Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences - RSS feed of 2000; 16(2)1300-0705December 2000Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1300-0705
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=360
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160142000-12-01005Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=361
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160192000-12-01015Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=362
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160252000-12-01021Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=363
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160322000-12-01027Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=364
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160382000-12-01033Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=365
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160442000-12-01039Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=366
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160502000-12-01045Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=367
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160552000-12-01051Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=368
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160622000-12-01057Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=369
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160742000-12-01063Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=370
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160792000-12-01075Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=371
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160882000-12-01081Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=372
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2160922000-12-01089Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=373
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2161012000-12-01093Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=374
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2161102000-12-01103Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=375
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2161172000-12-01111Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=376
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2161222000-12-01119Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=377
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2161282000-12-01123Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=378
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2161352000-12-01129Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=379
2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2161432000-12-01137Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=380
st , 2 nd
, 3 rd , 4 th , 5 th and 6<sup<t
months of age, the lambs' weight were found as, 4.20, 10.11, 16.03, 22.13.
26.24, 29.59 and 32.58 kg in the control group and 4,23, 10.64, 17.26. 19.74,
23.03. 26,58 and 30,34 kg in the experimental group respectively. From the data
obtained in this research, it was lound out that the seasonal effect on the
lambs' growth trails was important at all stages of growth except lor that of
birth weight. The effects of the litter size and sex on live weight were
significant at birth, 1 st and 2 nd months of age. at the
other stages of growth there was not. The effect of the mother age was important
at only birth weight.]]>2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2161512000-12-01145Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=381
th week At the 15 th ıweek, 228 chicks were
transported to the cages and 18 hours light was supplied (E.L). The other 228
birds reared on the floor receiving 10 hours light until 17 th week
and at 18 th and 19 th weeks 14 hours light and then at
20 th week of age they were also transported to the cages and they
received 18 hours light together with the other group (L.L). Egg production, egg
weight, feed consumption, live weight and Ihe number of deformed egg was
determined in both groups. Monthly egg production rates of E.L. and L.L. groups
were determined as 83,21 ±1.27 % and 68.054 ±1.37 from the 20 weeks of egg
respectively in the E.L group the increase in egg production continued in the
later periods, but the increase was not significant there was no significant
differences between the groups in respect to live weight, egg weight, mortality
and feed consumption. In conclusion , early lighting program in layers, without
no detrimental effects due to starling early egg production resulted in a slight
increase in egg production during the 12 months laying period.]]>2000-12-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences2161572000-12-01153Original Article